Monday, January 24, 2011

"What if drugs were legal?" Response


            For my Writing Pedagogy class this semester I have to keep a blog about my experiences with writing, tutoring, and my course work. One of our first assignments was to read a student paper that was written in response to an article about legalizing drugs and edit and comment on it.  I found that this was a more difficult exercise than I expected.
            While the paper needed a lot of editing, the assignment was not to tear apart the paper and edit every detail to make it better.  Instead we were expected to act as if this was a paper that we were actually confronted with in the Writing Center.  Thus, we had to consider not only the paper, but also the person who wrote it.  This means that I was concerned with helping the student and improving the paper as well as trying not to insult them or make them feel bad about their writing.
            I found it difficult to maintain a balance between correcting aspects of the paper and not criticizing the student too much.  It was hard to restrain myself from correcting every grammatical error, like the spelling of immigrant as “imagrant,” but I knew that helping the student effectively make his or her point was more important than worrying about spelling errors, which spell check could handle.  I tried to focus more on making sure the student wrote quality topic sentences and developed ideas fully.  The basic idea of what the student was trying to do was clear and I understood the argument, the problem was that it needed to be presented more effectively and with more supporting evidence.  I attempted to compliment the student on bringing up good ideas, while encouraging him or her to add more detail and go further with those thoughts.
            My main goal was not just to correct the errors in the paper but to encourage the student to work a little more on developing what he or she had started to do.  I tried to remember that this was not my paper to write and that I therefore needed to point the student in the right direction but not write the paper myself.  In the process I aimed to include both positive and negative, but constructive, comments.

1 comment:

  1. I sure hope that the treehouse you reference is not the famous "Creepy Treehouse" out of gaming theory.

    In any case, the balance you note is very very hard to strike. You will learn how to do it, in service of Steve North's famous dictum of making better writers, not better papers.

    ReplyDelete